Who are changing their minds on
corporal punishment/spanking/smacking
and
who are not changing their minds concerning this issue?
Over the almost 20 years of studying
corporal punishment/smacking/spanking, I have found it very interesting who the
people are who are changing their minds concerning this issue. I think looking
at who are the people who are really "growing in grace and knowledge"
is a very telling fact in this ongoing debate and one which I think speaks
volumes concerning who are taking risks for the advancement of knowledge and
truth and who are digging their heels in at all costs and resisting change.
The Professors Are Changing Their
Minds
Christian Scholars that teach at the
university or the graduate level are really on the cutting edge of learning. It
is these people who are best positioned to advance knowledge. University or
Christian Seminary environments are those in which learning should be advanced,
cultivated and new boundaries are to be reached for and bounds of truth tested.
In these types of environments,
scholars put forth new ideas for the pitiless criticisms of their peers. They
bare their academic souls in the hope that through their willingness to share,
learning and truth can be advanced.
It is then no surprise to us that we
have found some of the greatest forwarding thinking academic advances
concerning this issue coming out of the higher level of Christian academia.
Two great examples of this are found
in Professor William Webb's book "Corporal Punishment in the Bible: A
Redemptive Movement Hermeneutic for Troubling Texts."
In this essential book, Professor
Webb shows how he (and his wife) changed his mind on the issue of corporal
punishment of children. This is exactly what he said. Here is a quote from his
own blog:
"Unfortunately, Christians often get stuck
in their ability to apply the Bible in today’s world. It is my hope
that Corporal Punishment in the Bible: A Redemptive-Movement Hermeneutic
for Troubling Texts) will inspire hope and positive dialogue that
helps the Christian community move towards something better for our
children. The book outlines how Marilyn (my wife) and I changed our minds
about spanking." http://redemptivechristianity.com/?p=198
Hard to make it much clearer. A
changed mind! New insights! Leaving a past of incompleteness to a brighter
future seeking the direction of truth!
This is so inspiring. It feels
right. One wishes to join hands with Prof. and Mrs. Webb as they take us on a
journey toward redemption! Professor Webb was not alone in his journey either.
He brought someone else along for the ride. In this case, it was someone who,
in fact, is so well-known and respected in Christian academic circles. Professor Webb obtained the endorsement of one of
the world's most respected and well trusted theologians, Emeritus Professor I.
Howard Marshall, whose qualifications place him as one of the deans in the
world of Evangelical Christian scholarship.
Dr.
I. Howard Marshall, BA (Cambridge), MA, BD, PhD (Aberdeen), DD (Asbury)
Emeritus Professor of New Testament Exegesis and Honorary Research Professor;
Formerly Chair of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical and Theological Research;
President of the British New Testament Society and Chair of the Fellowship of
European Evangelical Theologians.
Note
what Emeritus Professor Marshall said in contributing the foreword to Prof.
Webb's book.
"But, where these other works tend
to be more academic in their approach, this book has added a nonacademic
postscript written at a more down-to-earth level, with abundance of personal
insight and experience as well as practical application that parents will find
helpful. (I could have profited much from it if it had been published when
Joyce and I were bringing up our four children.) Moreover, the approach is
conciliatory and gracious toward those who are gently but firmly corrected for
not realizing that their approach to Scripture does in fact lead them to move
beyond what Scripture says while holding to the supreme authority of Scripture.
… And that in its turn will forward what matters most to the author: the
development and practice of behavior that is truly biblical and Christian, and
so pleasing and glorifying to God as well as commending the gospel to the
people.
In short, I enjoyed the book and could
not put it down once I started to read it.”
”Foreword - Corporal Punishment and the
Bible: A Redemptive Movement Hermeneutic for Troubled Texts - http://www.ivpress.com/cgi-ivpress/book.pl/toc/code=2761”
– Buy yours here.)
This
is a very strong endorsement from Prof. Marshall.
I have known of the work of Prof. Marshall for over 25 years because I remember my father going to meet him once in the UK. Prof. Marshall was a colleague of several of my dad's other British scholar friends, another Emeritus Professor, the late F.F. Bruce and late Prof. W. H.C. Frend.
I have known of the work of Prof. Marshall for over 25 years because I remember my father going to meet him once in the UK. Prof. Marshall was a colleague of several of my dad's other British scholar friends, another Emeritus Professor, the late F.F. Bruce and late Prof. W. H.C. Frend.
What Do The Professors Have In
Common?
Now let us make no mistake about
this book. It is groundbreaking. It is a major departure from much of what the
evangelical world has been saying for the last few hundred years in the Western
world. It seeks to distance itself from the past and from old ways of thinking
to embrace a new view of this issue and this is what we Christians need from
our scholars. We need academic leadership. We need them to change their minds.
We need them to repent and say that they don't agree with what they thought in
the past. We need to hear them say: "I wish I knew this before because I
would have profited from it."
But isn't this how it is supposed to be in our own Christians walks? Yes, I think it is because isn't this what the Bible tells us to do? Here are a couple of texts which I can ask you to think about before deciding for yourself.
"But grow in the grace and
knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." (II Peter 3:18 ASV)
"to walk worthily of the Lord
unto all pleasing, bearing fruit in every good work, and increasing in the
knowledge of God;" (Colossians 1:10 ASV)
"But the path of the righteous
is like the light of dawn, which shines brighter and brighter until full
day." (Proverbs 4:18 RSV)
This is the Gospel that I believe
in. It is a Gospel of imperfect people seeking greater levels of truth on the
path towards a perfect God. But for some, this is not the Gospel they are
pursuing.
There is another group changing
their minds along with some religious scholars:
Lay people (especially mothers)
In addition religious scholars
growing in grace and knowledge, it is apparent to me that lay people are also
starting to question the traditional teachings on this issue. This is
especially the case for women and even more so for mothers of children who were
themselves recipients of corporal punishment. Many mothers have told me that
they never felt right about corporal punishment/smacking/spanking. They felt
conflicted about it, but did it anyway because they wanted to follow the
teachings of God as they best understood them. They were also taught not to
trust or listen to their inner voices, intuitions or personal moral compasses.
I have heard from scores of such lay
people, especially mothers. I am not alone as the sole voice talking about this
issue. I think that Clay Clarkson would agree with me concerning the people he
engages with. Lay people (especially women and mothers) are really starting to look at this issue anew and coming to conclusions about it which follow along with what the religious scholars I have herein quoted are suggesting.
If The Professors and Lay People
(especially mothers) Are Changing Their Minds, Who Are Not Changing Their
Minds?
So, now we have to turn this question about corporal punishment around and ask if highly trained academic theologians are changing their minds and growing in grace and knowledge concerning the issue of corporal punishment of children, who are the people who are not changing their minds?
1. Church Leaders
Concerning the issue of corporal
punishment, some Church Leaders are not and will not be changing their minds any time
soon. There is a reason for this. The reason is is that these people already
know the truth and do not need to grow in grace and knowledge. God has
commissioned them to have the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth,
so help them God! My father talked a little bit about his own experience with
these Church Leader types and I think it quite relevant to quote his experience here.
“And the most resistant of all to
the gospel truths are the leaders of denominations, churches, church schools,
or church universities. The hierarchies of the established religions are
interested in usually only one thing -- the perpetuation of the cult of
traditionalism. They do not want to know the truth, which will cause them
to change their ways. In other words, they claim in many cases, these
leaders of denominations, churches, and schools, and universities, to be the
ones who are commissioned by Christ to teach the gospel at this
time. They think that they have an ordained status from
God, a ticket from Him, to be able to give the message of the gospel to the
world, and they look on all others, even academic leaders and the general
public, as not being capable of taking this message of the gospel to
anyone. They feel they are the ones in authority to do it. And
those who accept that type of a belief are the most difficult to reach with the
truth.
Now
the greatest detriment to bringing forth the new truth are those who are the hierarchical leaders of organized religious
organizations. And if you start to take it to them, I will assure you, in
most cases, you are wasting your time. Don't even take any new
truth to religious leaders, that is, a church pastor, or a church
administrator. That doesn't mean that the person is necessarily
bad. No. It's just that he is resistant to the truth, because he is
in a position of authority, to be able to maintain the status quo, or, the
traditions that have been given to him by his ancestors, by the authorities who
ordained him, or commissioned him by the laying on of the hands in the first
place.
He
gets his living, his job, his prestige, his money, by being able to perpetuate
what they consider to be their denominational creeds. And if you come
along with a new teaching from the Bible, and it's absolutely the truth, still
they will resist in most cases. And why will they do that? Because
you are going counter to the teachings which that denomination, or that church,
accepts as their creed which governs the lives and the thinking processes of
their people.” (Ernest L. Martin – “Principles for Gospel Teaching”: Audio Cassette Message: ASK Publications: 1990)
Let
us understand that this information is not new. “Now that's exactly what
happened to Christ and the apostles in the First Century. That is why
Christ, when He went to the scribes and the Pharisees, He had a great
resistance on their part, because they had already established, in the first
Century, traditions. And the word "traditions" simply means
teachings counter to the Scripture (you can find this in the dictionary, if
you'd just look it up) counter to the teachings of the Scripture, which they
have inaugurated, extra-biblically that is, outside the Scripture, but which
are the dominating factors in their belief systems. That is what
traditions are. That's what the word "traditionalism" means.”
(ibid.)
Make
no mistake. Corporal punishment/spanking/smacking is a creed and a key doctrine
of many Christian denominations today. It is the tradition of the Christian
Church in the USA (and many other countries). It is the central belief that governs child rearing and is
looked on as the primary tool for parenting for Christians. Anyone who would
suggest anything else is not only looked on as an absolute fool worthy of only
the most deep belly laughter one can imagine, but is often designated as
teaching absolute falsehood and blasphemous doctrinal teachings which are to be
considered not only dangerous but as downright evil to the core..
Because
this is how many Church Leaders look at this issue and it is so fundamentally
connected to their belief systems, don't look for any mind changing here in the
near future. In fact, rather we can look for some of these Church Leaders, when
threatened, to dig in their heels.
Corporal
punishment/spanking/smacking is one of those teachings so dominant in Christian
culture that it is so easy for some Church Leaders to latch onto it and trumpet it
from the pulpits because it is seemingly so easy for anyone to understand. God
said: Spare the Rod and Spoil the Child! Case Closed. End of Story.
2.
Christian Psychologists
I
think it is pretty clear that we all know who were are here talking about. If
you have been trumpeting for decades the 'wisdom' of administering corporal punishment
and selling millions of books along the way, the chance of you changing your
view and repudiating your entire corpus of published material and saying that
you were wrong will never happen.
3.
Bible Publishers
The
realm of those who will never change when it comes to spanking children has
gotten wider of late to include Bible Publishers and these Bible Publishers are
strongly connected to some Church Leaders and Christian Psychologists. A good
example of this is found in the following Bible version.
"Don’t
fail to discipline your children. They won’t die if you spank them.
Physical discipline may well save them from death." (Proverbs
23:14,14 New Living Translation).
Yes,
you've read correctly, The Bible uses the term "spank" according to
this new version, which is now one of the top selling Bible versions in the
USA.
Now
here we can ask this question. Do you think for one minute that the Bible
Publishing firm who published this Bible is for one moment going to entertain
the position of Professor's Webb and Marshall? The chances of this happening
are zero! It would mean that they were wrong and being wrong does not sell
Bibles.
Conclusion
We
are in an age of learning and change. The trends against corporal
punishment/spanking/smacking are totally moving in the direction of non-violence.
These are generational issues which take scores of years to change, but I
believe that the spirit of God is moving as Bill Webb says in a movement
towards redemption. I am totally convinced that by the time my children start
to begin their families (in 15-20 years), we will notice major differences in
people's view point on this issue, just as much as we who have been following
this issue will note how much things have changed since the mid-1990's. God
speed that day!
I
close with an ancient prayer my dad used to include in all of his books
From the cowardice that shrinks from
new truth,
From the laziness that is content
with half-truths'
From the arrogance that thinks it
knows all truth,
O God of Truth, deliver us.
-- Ancient Prayer
3 comments:
Samuel,
I thought you might be interested to know that I just listened to a teaching by Suuqiina, of Indigenous Messengers Intl., (he mentioned a theological background).
In this teaching on Hebrew Idioms, he mentions the Proverb about the rod, saying it is actually a Hebrew idiom. His description of the idiom translates the rod as the Torah. I am very curious to know what he has learned. Perhaps this idiom -ic background can be used to shed light to others.
May God give courage to Bible teachers to come forward regarding the true meaning of the text from the original Aramaic/Hebrew. And may you be strong to defend the Name of our God, who has been too long used by the Enemy to demean and wound the weakest and most vulnerable of us.
April J
I thought you might be interested to know that I recently heard a teaching that revealed the proverb about the rod is actually a Hebrew idiom. Something about the Torah being the "rod."
Suuqiina, of Indigenous Messengers Intl., who also has a theological background. It would be interesting to find out more about what he knows about it. (:
Well done. Proverbs isnt necessarily direct divine revelation but the sage wisdom of the day and was never meant to it as a mindless fundamentalist approach of the end of reason on a issue. Keep up the good work. This is the need of the day. Good by fundamentalism. Lets hope.
Post a Comment