Did the Biblical society influence
the collective behavior of people?
Acheived and Ascribed Shame - A case study using the Parable of the Prodigal Son
Let’s continue
with verse 13 of Luke 15.
“Not many days later, the younger son gathered all he
had and took a journey into a far country, and there he squandered his property
in reckless living.”
Comment: So here you need to continue reading in a
little bit of first century Torah-oriented Israel’s culture into the story. As
I said, previously, this is a major affront to the family. How dare could he do
such a thing. Really in some ways of looking at it, this young man is more like
that one described in Deuteronomy 21:18: the stubborn and rebellious son.
This is often a common theme in films. One of the younger
son’s leaves and all of the responsibility for the family falls on the elder
son and he resents his younger brother. No doubt, when we look at the actions
later of the older brother, we can see someone who is not happy with the
activities undertaken by his hooligan little brother.
So now all of the responsibility has fallen on the
older brother. He is dealing with the shame of the property sale and his father
is busy making up some story to justify the departure of his younger son. No
doubt, the father is trying to put a good face on this whole very unorthodox
situation. In fact, the shame that this son is bringing on the family not only
is a shame to the immediate family, but it also affects the whole extended
family, clan, and even the tribe. This is not some trend that the people in the
area where this father is living wish to see repeated. In fact, when we
consider this story, we have to understand that the life of the younger son now
due to his actions could be in danger, believe it or not. It has to be
understood that what is taking place here is describing a very tragic situation
in a first century cultural context where the Bible is the ruling book of the
land. Let’s go on.
“And when he had spent everything, a severe famine
arose in that country, and he began to be in need. 15 So he went and hired himself out to one of the citizens of that
country, who sent him into his fields to feed pigs. 16 And he was longing to be fed
with the pods that the pigs ate, and no one gave him anything.”
Comment: So now he has reached the low point. He
is destitute working as a labourer feeding pigs. What is interesting to note
here is the reference to the “pods” that the pigs ate. Here it is to be
understood that they are talking about the fruit of the carob tree, which the
pods are not good for food, but some animals seem to like them.
Now, what is this young man thinking? He is thinking
how he has ruined his life. How he will never marry and have children because
no father in his right mind would give his daughter to marry such a loser and
rebel against authority and the prevailing culture at that time.
What we can see here is a picture being painted of a
‘rebel’, a one totally outside of the cultural norm of Torah culture in Israel
in Jesus’ day. Such a person would have been reviled and called the ‘stubborn
and rebellious son” that he was and the agricultural patriarchal community of Israel
would have wanted nothing to do with this rebel. The story continues:
17 “But when he came
to himself, he said, ‘How many of my father's hired servants have more than
enough bread, but I perish here with hunger! 18 I will arise and go to my father, and I will say to him, “Father, I
have sinned against heaven and before you. 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son. Treat me as one of your
hired servants.”’
Comment: So here he remembers how good things were
at home. Now he has no plan or future to return home as a son in any capacity.
He is planning to return home just to have a place to live and food to eat.
Nothing more, because he realizes the shame he has brought on his family. But
wait! What happens?
We will continue this story in the next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment